Several years ago I was introduced to the notion of “friendship evangelism”. If you’re a Christian you are most likely familiar with the term. The idea behind friendship evangelism is that Christians must befriend unbelievers and establish a personal relationship with them prior to addressing their need for a Savior. I know many people who embrace this view and who believe that the opportunity to evangelize must be earned through a demonstration of love.
At first blush this may seem like a sound approach. But, in the end, one of the two usually suffers. Either the friendship is compromised when the Gospel is shared or the Gospel is compromised to preserve the friendship.
So it is with “Christian coalitions”. As my friend Kim so wisely pointed out, when it comes to coalitions,
“There will always be a difference of opinion re: what is sound and not; what is acceptable and to whom, etc. When there are many denominations represented, who gets to have the final word?”
We’ve seen this played out for public consumption with the resignation of James MacDonald from The Gospel Coalition. The rather ambiguous non-response from the TGC has only served to muddy the waters regarding MacDonald’s embrace/promotion/endorsement of well-known modalist/word of faith heretic TD Jakes in the now infamous leadership conference/simulcast known as The Elephant Room 2.
As with “friendship evangelism”, when push comes to shove, it is the Gospel which will suffer, in order to maintain the reputation of the coalition. I say this because throughout this controversy The Gospel Coalition, and it’s members, have remained virtually silent. It is clear that their announcement of MacDonald’s departure was meticulously crafted, so much so that many readers have said, “I thought it meant this,” or “I thought it meant that.” Suffice it to say, the statement was vague enough to leave much uncertainty hanging in the air.